DOING BUNIESS IN THAILAND | DRKI
May 2024
Thailand, covering 514,000 square kilometers in South East Asia, boasts diverse geographical features such as the central plain dominated by the Chao Phraya River. Bordered by Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia, and Malaysia, the country is divided into four regions. Bangkok, the sprawling capital with, as of 2023, approximately 11.5 million people, serves as the commercial and industrial nucleus, situated along the Chao Phraya River. Other major cities like Chiang Mai, Nakhon Ratchasima, and Hat Yai contribute to the country's economic landscape. With about 75% of the population residing in rural areas, individuals continue to migrate to urban centers, driven by the nation's status as a newly industrialized country, fueled by a burgeoning industrial sector and economic growth.
Read more
BUSINESS TALK
BUSINESS TALK
When tough time loom | DRKI
Since 2020, the Revenue Department has gathered information from large companies that have...
From Fossil to Solar: Tax-Saving Opportunities for Investors under Thailand’s New Energy Policy | DRKI
To accelerate the transition from fossil fuels to solar energy plan, aligned with Thailand’s goals...
Revenue Department unveils its Tax Audit Plan for FY2026 | DRKI
In early February 2026, the Revenue Department released on its website the “Tax Audit Plan for...
Thailand’s Crackdown on Nominee Shareholding — What Foreign Investors Must Know Now | DRKI
Thailand has strengthened enforcement against nominee shareholding, and pressure on foreign owned...
Thai Revenue Department Announces Updates to VAT Return Form (PP.30) and Attachment | DRKI
The Thai Revenue Department (“TRD”) has announced updates to the monthly VAT return form (“PP....
Thai Revenue Department to release measures to promote Clean Energy | DRKI
The Thai Revenue Department (“TRD”) released news on additional tax deductions to support the use...
KNOWLEDGE
KNOWLEDGE
![The reason she asked this question is because the IBC company that she taken care of was audited by the Revenue Department. The officer assessed additional income for the company, stating that IBC services must always include a mark-up of no less than 5%. The officer justified this by referring to the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. So, I went back to review the 2022 revised version of the OECD Guidelines and found the following: 1. First, let’s clarify that the OECD Guidelines are not law, and Thailand is not a member of the OECD (although it participates in the BEPS framework for preventing base erosion and profit shifting by multinational enterprises). Therefore, we should view these guidelines as merely “generally accepted principles.” 2. The OECD guidelines that the officer referred to is likely found in Chapter VII, concerning Intra-group services, specifically section D.2, which discusses a simplified transfer pricing method for low value-adding services. Examples of such services include accounting and auditing, general administration, human resources, IT services, etc. (see sections 7.45–7.49 for details). 3. The purpose of the recommendations in section D.2 is to “make life easier,” and can be summarized into three points: (a) Reduce the burden of proving the benefit received and determining transfer pricing under the Arm’s Length Principle. (b) Provide assurance to multinational enterprise groups that the Revenue Department will accept transfer prices determined under these conditions. (c) Offer guidance to the Revenue Department regarding transfer pricing documentation that [taxpayers] should prepare to facilitate efficient tax audits. 4. At this point, I’d like to present the exact wording cited by the officer, along with its translation, for consideration. “7.61. In determining the arm’s length charge for low value-adding intra-group services, the MNE provider of services shall apply a profit mark-up to all costs in the pool with the exception of any pass-through costs as determined under paragraphs 2.99 and 7.34. The same mark-up shall be utilized for all low value-adding services irrespective of the categories of services. The mark-up shall be equal to 5% of the relevant cost as determined in Section D.2.2. The mark-up under the simplified approach does not need to be justified by a benchmarking study.” That is, paragraph 7.61 of the OECD Guidelines suggests that if an MNE applies a 5% mark-up to the total cost of low value-adding services, the MNE is not required to conduct a Benchmarking Study. We can observe that paragraph D.2.2 of the OECD Guidelines does not mandate that an MNE must set transfer pricing to ensure a profit margin of not less than 5% from providing low value-adding services. Likewise, Thai law does not prescribe such a requirement. However, if a tax officer refers to the OECD Guidelines during a tax audit, they may inform the IBC company that: “If the company sets transfer prices with a 5% mark-up, it may be exempted from conducting a Benchmarking Study. However, when the company’s profit margin is below 5%, the Officer may ask the company to submit a Benchmarking Study to demonstrate that the transfer pricing applied complies with the Arm’s Length Principle and is consistent with Section 71 bis.”](/images/DRKI/Services/CN/Insight-CN/IBC.jpg#joomlaImage://local-images/DRKI/Services/CN/Insight-CN/IBC.jpg?width=1500&height=1000)
©
2026
Dherakupt International Law Office Ltd.
บริษัท สำนักกฎหมายสากล ธีรคุปต์ จำกัด